The Green Party’s Reproductive Rights Policy: An Appraisal

By Professor Fiona de Londras, University of Birmingham E: f.delondras@bham.ac.uk T: @fdelond

The Green Party has released a reproductive rights policy in advance of the general election. The policy is very welcome, and is a further indication that reproductive justice is likely to be a central issue in the forthcoming election. The policy is especially interesting in that it speaks to a broad reproductive rights policy, endorsing better maternity care and more choice in maternity and birthing options, and committing to access to safe and affordable contraception, which is a very welcome development. The publication of this policy also speaks to the Green Party’s decision to support repeal of the 8th Amendment by means of a referendum, although its support is given “on the condition that the Government have provided draft legislation which will be put in place if the referendum passes”. It is on this proposed law that I want to concentrate here. Continue reading “The Green Party’s Reproductive Rights Policy: An Appraisal”

The Green Party’s Reproductive Rights Policy: An Appraisal

Homeless Election Candidates, Dirty Tricks & Rupture in American Politics?

The question of populism and radical change has re-emerged in American politics, first with Obama and now with the tea party movement. However, it was another story that recently caught my eye. The New York Times carried a story about Republican ‘agents’ (or ‘operatives’) encouraging homeless people to stand unopposed in the Green Party primaries. Because the green party do not have sufficient coverage to stand centrally selected candidates for all ballots, homeless people have gained the nomination to stand for local government. Beyond the curiosity of the story, I want to argue that it is more significant and revealing than it might initially seem. Continue reading “Homeless Election Candidates, Dirty Tricks & Rupture in American Politics?”

Homeless Election Candidates, Dirty Tricks & Rupture in American Politics?

Developments on the Revised Programme for Government

This post will be updated as matters develop today. Although there are of course many issues within the revised programme for government, our focus here will be on human rights related matters.

As the Green Party hold their party meeting this morning to vote on both the revised programme for government on which agreement was reach late yesterday evening and the proposals for the National Asset Management Agency, we still do not know what the contents of the revised programme for government are. There are some leaks reported in today’s Irish Times. In particular, it is claimed that it contains a commitment to 500 new teaching jobs (with a view to maintaining or lowering the teacher : student ratio) with recruitment to begin immediately and to not introducing third level fees. On electoral reform there is said to be agreement on the introduction of a system of vouched expenses for parliamentarians and a ban on corporate donations to political parties, both of which are very welcome.

Beyond that, however, we are largely in the dark-the proposed revised programme was not made widely available last night and there doesn’t seem to be anything leaking out of the Green Party’s meeting this morning. And so we continue to wait to hear whether the Government will fall this weekend and if not whether any commitments to human rights organisations have been included in the programme. However, if money can be found (as is suggested) for the re-housing of the Abbey Theatre in the GPO and the maintenance of the Irish Film Board one would hope that money can be found to ensure vital human rights infrastructure such as the Irish Human Rights Commission and Equality Authority can achieve the highest possible levels of functionality.

UPDATE 11.52am The revised (or ‘renewed’, apparently) programme can be accessed here.

Here are a few of the spotlight issues with human rights implications, but there are enormous amounts of commitments that have important implications:

  • commitment to ensure passage of the Civil Partnership Bill by end of 2009
  • commitment to review legislation relating to family law (guardianship, custody, access)
  • a solid commitment to introduce legislation to recognise gender reassignment/reallignment
  • hold a constitutional referendum on Article 41.2 to broaden the reference to women in the home to a reference to parents in the home
  • commitment to ensuring gender equality in particular
  • a commitment to ensuring implementation of the National Disability Strategy notwithstanding the recession
  • full implementation of the Ryan Report’s recommendations
  • a constitutional referendum on children’s rights
  • review and amend as appropriate and necessary legislation relating to potential inspection regimes in Shannon Airport re rendition (this is, in my view, very watery…)

Nothing as far as I can see about committing to maintaining and adequately funding human rights institutions. If the programme is approved, we will be commenting on how these various commitments might be operationalised here on HRinI.

UPDATE 12:13 There is now a live blog from inside the Convention which you can view here.

For Twitter fans, the tag is #pfg

UPDATE 13:45 Mary White was on RTE Radio 1 at lunchtime today speaking about the revised programme for government. The conversation was primarily on education and White claimed that the agreement to not introduce third level fees, to provide further educational psychologists and to hire 500 new teachers over the life of the government (although, by the way, when retirements andcontract-non-renewals are factored in this may not be as significant as is being represented) was a major achievement by the Green Party. She said there has been no agreement on social welfare cuts in Budget 2009.

UPDATE 19:16 The Green Party has voted to support the revised Programme for Government. RTÉ reports that the margin was more than 4:1 in favour of the reform programme. You can expect commentary on the various rights-related aspects of the programme here on HRinI over the next few days and weeks.

Developments on the Revised Programme for Government

Renegotiating the Programme for Government: Whither Human Rights?

cla97sAs previously mentioned here, this week has seen the government partners engage in a renegotiation of the programme for government. While we were made aware before the commencement of the talks that the Green Party had an extensive ‘wish list’ and that commitment to human rights and rights-related organisations featured on that list, there has been something of a veil of silence surrounding developments since then (also noted by Ferdinand von Prondzynski this morning). This morning’s Irish Times, however, informs us that education (especially teacher:pupil ratios) and electoral reform (especially a reduction in the number of TDs) have moved to the centre stage of the negotiations. Of course, both of these areas have human rights implications too–effective education, effective representative political systems etc… are important for the creation of conditions in which people can exercise their rights to the fullest degree–but they are decidedly long-term in terms of having embedded human rights impacts. The early talk of insisting upon the adequate funding of the Equality Authority, for example, seems to have quietened to a whisper and it is difficult to avoid the suspicion that either agreement on this was easily reached or it has slipped to the bottom of the agenda. We continue to wait to see the details of the proposed agreement. The Green Party is scheduled to meet tomorrow to consider whether the renegotiated programme will be approved by 2/3 of the members (the margin needed to keep the Green Party in government) and we can expect to see some details tonight or in the morning.

UPDATE: RTE Radio’s 9am news informs me that Éamon Ryan (Green Party, Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources) has announced that unless agreement is reached by lunchtime today the Green Partyministers will resign. They had not reached agreement by lunchtime. They did not resign…

Photo credit

Renegotiating the Programme for Government: Whither Human Rights?

Equality and Human Rights on the Political Agenda

Now that the referendum to amend the Constitution in respect of the Lisbon Treaty has been passed by a 2/3 majority, domestic political attention can finally be focused elsewhere. Top of the agenda this week is surely the process of renegotiation of the Programme for Government between the Green Party and Fianna Fáil with a document submitted from Mary Harney who, of course, is now party-less following the demise of the Progressive Democrats. The Green Party has made it clear that equality and human rights and, particularly, securing budgets for organisations committed thereto is within their agenda for this week’s talks.

There is little doubt but that this process is being driven by the Green Party whose leader, John Gormley, has said that unless the revised programme for government is passed by a 2/3 majority of the Green Party at conference next weekend the party will be obliged to pull out of government, thereby most likely triggering a general election. (For commentary see this piece in the Sunday Tribune) Continue reading “Equality and Human Rights on the Political Agenda”

Equality and Human Rights on the Political Agenda